Courts today have one mission: securing justice for all. Justice can be an empty promise if individuals or groups of people are denied equal and fair representation in the courts. There should be no cultural, racial, or social barriers. Unfortunately, these acts still rear their ugly faces in courts today. People should not be alienated from accessing courts as this translates to denial of democracy. Justice and fairness are mandatory for a democratic society. Each court and its workers ought to remain vigilant and maintain high integrity levels. In an ideal court people are treated fairly and impartially regardless of their race, tribe, gender, political orientation, and origin. Courts emphasize more training and results from judges and magistrates as it was mentioned in paper revision service
Another issue affecting courts today is continued illegalization of social problems (Halpern & Lamb, 1982). Political trends, growing populations, and financial pressures are some of the factors that characterize court operations and systems today. Why do the innocent end up in courts? Court systems have, however, not been devoid of tainted imager. There have been instances of what a learned lawyer friend calls selective justice. Justice cannot be bought. Justice is to be dispensed. Justice delayed is justice denied. Courts are meant to curb anti-social behavior and isolate dangerous people from the society. These people could then be taken to prisons where they are to be rehabilitated and often taught life skills. But personal issues at homes, in schools, in hospitals, and in the community at large should also contribute to instilling good behavior and morals among members of the society. The courts should then be left with at least easier options of dealing with the vices. Community resources should be distributed equitably among all members of the society without any disparity. These simple acts will go a long way in ensuring that the number of court cases is significantly reduced.
The jury needs to undergo radical transformation. This follows recent reports that the courts are corrupt. This threatens justice. If the jury is refined, the judges will ensure justice is dispensed in the best way and time possible (Halpern & Lamb, 1982). There have been instances where cases take long or are dealt with the shortest time possible. The court represents diverse problems of the society, and it is only right that the courts deal with society issues first. Judicial independence and preservation should be a key concern in the courts.
Respect for the courts is also important. Politicization of the courts is wrong. Though it is not widespread, but politicians should desist from meddling in court processes. Judiciary is a branch of government that should be accorded the autonomy and respect it deserves (Hellman, 1990). There can only be a just society if courts are granted their freedom so that they can dispense fair justice for all. Some time back, say, 30 years ago, court victims had limited legal rights to present their case and be heard in the courts. They were notified of court proceedings or they had no fair representation in terms of them being represented by lawyers. They could not even make their points in courts. However, lately there have being significant developments in creation of legal assistance for victims.
Future Issues
The following areas will have to be looked into:
· Victims’ rights to attend criminal proceedings;
· They will have to be compensated for time lost and hurt reputations;
· They will be heard and be allowed to participate in proceedings of courts;
· There will be a need for them to be informed on events and court proceedings, their legal rights, remedies, and available services;
· There will be more emphasis on protection of rights and court systems that are devoid of harassment and intimidation;
· There is a right to compensation for victims and those wrongly charged;
· There is a need for speedy trials.
For all the above to be fully achieved, there must exist a proper legal frame work, a reformation of the judicial system that will ensure that the factors listed above are realized.
Management Issues
Courts are projected to lose cases private sectors that are threatening to arbitrate and mediate in court cases. Courts ought to understand these issues so that they incorporate emerging trends. Courts will continue to evolve to meet rising justice demands (Hellman, 1990). Future court management will have to incorporate new technologies and innovation in courts. There will be division of courts and a clear distinction between courts and private sectors. The use of technology will go a long way in easement of court processes and procedures. E-filing will involve the use on the Internet to file cases electronically. This will save paper and time. Access to documents will be made possible through a simple click of the mouse. Victims and offenders will be able to access status conferences.
Language Interpretation in Courts
Due to language barriers, there is a need to involve more interpreters so that varied communication needs are met. This will ensure that victims, who do not speak English or those who are illiterate are well represented in courts. In this regard, it is important to train interpreters so that they represent those with language difficulties in courts. They have to be taught about different cultures and how different people communicate in terms of body language and signs. It is expected that these measures will ensure fair representation in courts (Gazelle, 1978). This will equally mean that more money will be injected into the judiciary system to fund these reforms.
